According to researcher the close relationship between workers' claims movements

In this same sense, R. Hyman and T. Elger, in researching four different companies - railroad, press, steel and automobile - show how the political conjuncture, state intervention and the market do my paper situation dictate industrial relations and the forms of organizing, making Taylorist / Fordist managerial practices contrary to the interests of capital; leaving some room for decision in the hands of workers, contrary to what Taylor imagined, can contribute to the increase of productivity. 

 "As Burawoy argued (1978: 283), capital has not always seen Taylorism as a managerial practice that favors it. Open administrative prescriptions and pressure can often be unproductive, provoking uncontrollable resistance - particularly when the workforce is unaccustomed workers who have been given an individual or collective space of autonomy can prove to be more productive: the daily adjustments made by the workers themselves build their ideological effects and become elements of capitalist control (Burawoy 1978: Paradoxically, then, job controls serve the interests of capital, even reinforcing the workers' commitment to profitable production.32 But there is a crucial question concerning the limits - ideological and materials - acceptable by capital and the forms that these limits time.

Ergus Murray describes how worker militancy in Italy, in an unfavorable market environment, by creating "diseconomies of scale", makes the Fordist assembly line unfeasible and favors the physical decentralization of production, stimulating the creation of putting-out and splitting -up-production: "(...) the integrated automotive plant developed in rapidly expanding markets, with the balance of class forces leaning in favor of capital, made possible and profitable a particular combination of technology (mechanized production line) It was the coincidence of all these factors that made the integrated plant the most profitable form of organization of production in the postwar consumer durable consumer industries.When labor rebelled and markets began to stagnating, Do my assignment for me uk the efficiency of this form of production was undermined, and both bourgeois capitalists and economists discovered the diseconomies of scale. "34 In summary, we had the opportunity to observe some important transformations that occurred in the organization of work on the assembly line, from the overcoming of qualified work carried out by autonomous teams, with the introduction of the conveyor belt, the debate between the statements of the School of Human Relations the primacy of the social) and the proposals of Léon Walther (primate of the psychophysiological), the critics to the "dogma of the division of labor" and the return to the semi-autonomous groups, and, finally, the retrocesso for the Italian putting out. We hope to have contributed to clarify the reasons that led the assembly line to be the privileged space for psychotechnology, psychology, sociology and the socio-technical approach of organizational theory.