History of Manufacturing in the United States says, can someone write my paper about the automobile industry: 'No industry has exerted any more influence on the development of machine tools, and particularly of tools special ... '. Between 1910 and 1913, new machines emerged within the factory almost daily. Workers and machines were constantly moving, in this observed moment, between the growing heaps of tools and supplies. Ford insists on development and experimented with new time-saving schemes. Inclined plans were installed next to each operation ... all these technological innovations were superimposed on the original work organization and workers inherited from the bicycle industry.
The pace of innovations had been so rapid that workers still considered themselves skilled mechanics. They imagined innovations to be temporary and production would return to its former orientation towards work teams with skilled mechanics themselves the organizers of the production and assembly process. Many assemblers were assigned to teams and moved from chassis to chassis performing their only specialized function. Each team had a group of helpers and runners to get tools and supplies
"At that time, it was almost impossible to walk around the factory, it was so crowded with workers, machines, tools and stacks of stocks that a person could not move without falling on a mate or on top of materials. The rate of absenteeism was 10% per day for the workforce as a whole and the average length of stay in the company was less than 18 months. "3 To ensure and increase production efficiency, how did H. Ford face these adverse working conditions? "The technological solution Order homework online to the chaotic conditions in the factory was, of course, the movement of the conveyor belt that was introduced at the Highland Park plant in 1913. The main intention of the new system was to get the work off the ground. The tasks were re-specialized, reaching a point where all workers could perform all their operations without moving their feet.Traditional skills were further weakened ... "4 In this way, the introduction of the conveyor belt greatly contributed to the expansion of the progressive process of disqualification of work, seeming to put down any illusion, desire or possibility of a return to the old teamwork, when the workers organized the production. But it happens that even with the introduction of the conveyor belt, work - the subjective aspect of the production process - remains the dominant element in the assembly process. Efficiency and productivity continue to depend on the will of the collective worker, the men taken as instruments of labor.
This is easy to understand because in the Fordist assembly line a revolution occurs in the workforce, not in the instrument, the assembly takes place through a "system of machines where (like the manufactures) the pieces are the men" .5 As man, for the execution of standardized and routine movements, is a very imperfect instrument, the efficiency of the assembly line will depend very much on the role of management. It will be up to the administration to develop policies and guidelines that ensure the workers' acceptance of the new labor relations.
The pace of innovations had been so rapid that workers still considered themselves skilled mechanics. They imagined innovations to be temporary and production would return to its former orientation towards work teams with skilled mechanics themselves the organizers of the production and assembly process. Many assemblers were assigned to teams and moved from chassis to chassis performing their only specialized function. Each team had a group of helpers and runners to get tools and supplies
"At that time, it was almost impossible to walk around the factory, it was so crowded with workers, machines, tools and stacks of stocks that a person could not move without falling on a mate or on top of materials. The rate of absenteeism was 10% per day for the workforce as a whole and the average length of stay in the company was less than 18 months. "3 To ensure and increase production efficiency, how did H. Ford face these adverse working conditions? "The technological solution Order homework online to the chaotic conditions in the factory was, of course, the movement of the conveyor belt that was introduced at the Highland Park plant in 1913. The main intention of the new system was to get the work off the ground. The tasks were re-specialized, reaching a point where all workers could perform all their operations without moving their feet.Traditional skills were further weakened ... "4 In this way, the introduction of the conveyor belt greatly contributed to the expansion of the progressive process of disqualification of work, seeming to put down any illusion, desire or possibility of a return to the old teamwork, when the workers organized the production. But it happens that even with the introduction of the conveyor belt, work - the subjective aspect of the production process - remains the dominant element in the assembly process. Efficiency and productivity continue to depend on the will of the collective worker, the men taken as instruments of labor.
This is easy to understand because in the Fordist assembly line a revolution occurs in the workforce, not in the instrument, the assembly takes place through a "system of machines where (like the manufactures) the pieces are the men" .5 As man, for the execution of standardized and routine movements, is a very imperfect instrument, the efficiency of the assembly line will depend very much on the role of management. It will be up to the administration to develop policies and guidelines that ensure the workers' acceptance of the new labor relations.
History of Manufacturing in the United States
Reviewed by Stephine
on
November 22, 2017
Rating:
Reviewed by Stephine
on
November 22, 2017
Rating:
No comments: